Have you been affected by a pharmaceutical injury? We'll give you the representation you need today!
Free Case Evaluation
For decades, talcum powder has been declared as a harmless solution for rashes and sweaty skin. Now, hundreds of women are taking action against Johnson & Johnson for a connection between talcum powder and ovarian cancer.
If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after using one of Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder or Shower to Shower body powder, you may be entitled to compensation.
Johnson & Johnson has paid out more than $100 million to victims who sued the pharmaceutical giant for a link between its products and ovarian cancer. In May 2016, the company was ordered by a jury to pay $55 million to a woman who developed ovarian cancer after using the well known baby powder.
Fill out our case evaluation form to receive your free consultation from one of our pharmaceutical lawyers. Our knowledgeable attorneys are familiar with the link between Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder and ovarian cancer and can review your lawsuit claim against Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder.
Background of Talcum Powder Lawsuits
Frequently found in nurseries and bathrooms across the nation, Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder has been used by millions of people. It’s estimated that as many as 40% of women have used talcum powder for feminine hygiene.
Talcum powder is made up of talc, a soft mineral composed mainly of magnesium, oxygen, and silicon. Thanks to its ability to reduce friction and absorb moisture, talcum powder became widely used for diaper rash and feminine hygiene. Johnson & Johnson introduced talcum powder more than a hundred years ago. Early marketing campaigns quickly made Baby Powder a staple product in households everywhere.
Despite being billed as safe for everyone to use, mounting evidence points to a possible connection between talcum powder and ovarian cancer.
Hundreds of women are now filing ovarian cancer lawsuits against the pharmaceutical company for failing to warn consumers of the deadly risks.
Studies Linking Talcum Powder and Ovarian Cancer
The first scientific link between ovarian cancer and talcum powder was published back in 1971. In a study titled “Talc and Carcinoma of the Ovary and Cervix” that appeared in The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, researchers examined 13 ovarian tumors to see whether asbestos from talcum powder was present. They did not find asbestos but in 10 of the 13 tumors (roughly 75%), talc particles were found deeply embedded in the tissue.
Another study published in 1982 found the first statistical link between ovarian cancer and talcum powder. Published in the journal Cancer, the study found that women who used talcum powder on or near the genitals were three times as likely to develop cancer as women who did not use it.
Dr. Daniel Cramer, the principal author of the study, said that further research was needed before doctors should recommend women avoid talc.
Since 1982, at least 20 more epidemiological studies have found that long-term use of talc increases the risk of ovarian cancer by roughly 33%.
Why You Should Let Us Handle Your Lawsuit
We have the skills and experience needed to take on large drug companies. Our firm works hard to ensure our clients see the results they deserve.
But our relationship with clients doesn’t just end there. We guide you through the legal process to make sure you feel informed and supported the whole way.
We also work on a 100% contingency basis. That means we don’t get paid unless you win.
We're Here to Make it Easy for You
1 - Contact Us
Call the number at the top of the screen, or simply fill out the form at the top of the page.
2 - We'll Evaluate Your Case For Free
No obligation required. We review the details of your case, and let you know if you qualify for compensation and discuss any questions or concerns you have
3 - We’ll Go to Bat for You
Our drug injury lawyers have experience taking on large pharmaceutical companies and will fight for the compensation you deserve.
Free Case Evaluation
Johnson & Johnson’s Denial of Any Link
As questions have begun to surface about whether talcum powder may cause cancer, Johnson & Johnson has steadfastly defended its product. They’ve always publicly said talc is safe.
In fact, Johnson & Johnson even criticized the 1982 study that said women who used talc for hygienic care had a higher risk of ovarian cancer. A public relations officer for the company told the New York Times, “We feel there is a vast amount of published research on talc in humans and animals that has shown no tendency of pure cosmetic-grade talc to cause cancer.”
Despite publicly defending its products, recently discovered internal documents from Johnson & Johnson showed the company was aware of the studies and risks.
Here’s what an attorney in one of the cases against Johnson & Johnson told the Associated Press:
“The evidence is real clear that Johnson & Johnson has known about the dangers associated with talcum powder for over 30 years,” Onder said. “Instead of giving a warning, what they did was target the groups most at risk for developing ovarian cancer,” specifically marketing to overweight women, blacks and Latinos, he said.
Johnson & Johnson willingly ignored clear evidence linking its products with cancer and continued to market its dangerous products to the at-risk. This behavior is unacceptable and the pharmaceutical giant needs to be held liable for its actions.
Significant Talcum Powder Lawsuits
More and more women are coming forward to take on Johnson & Johnson. Several cases have already paved the way for large class-action suits against the company. Here are three of the most significant cases.
Berg v. Johnson & Johnson
Dean Berg was the first woman to sue Johnson & Johnson for not warning consumers of potential risks. Berg was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2006 and turned down $1.3 million for an out-of-court settlement because she didn’t want to settle in secret. Her case went to trial in 2013, and a jury found Johnson & Johnson negligent. However, Berg did not receive any damages.
Fox v. Johnson & Johnson
Jacqueline Fox found out she had advanced ovarian cancer in 2013. She had sprinkled Baby Powder on her underwear every day since she was a teen. Fox sued the company for negligence, conspiracy, and failure to warn of potential risk. Four months after Fox died from cancer in October 2015, a jury in St. Louis awarded the plaintiff $72 million in damages. This verdict encouraged more women to come forth.
Ristesund v. Johnson & Johnson
In May 2016, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay $55 million to Gloria Ristesund after developing ovarian cancer while using the company’s talcum powder. Jim Onder, the attorney for the plaintiffs, claimed internal documents showed Johnson & Johnson was aware of the link. After the verdict, Johnson & Johnson released a statement in defense of its products: “Unfortunately, the jury’s decision goes against 30 years of studies by medical experts around the world that continue to support the safety of cosmetic talc.”
File a Talcum Powder Lawsuit Today
Despite overwhelming evidence of a link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, Johnson & Johnson still insists it’s talc-based products are safe. Hundreds of women have come forward, claiming that the company’s products are raising their risk of ovarian cancer. Yet Johnson & Johnson has done nothing to warn future consumers or change its formula.
If you or a loved one developed ovarian cancer after using talcum powder let our pharmaceutical attorneys fight for you. Fill out our free case evaluation form and have our lawyers review your claim. Time to file your lawsuit if running out, contact us today!
Macaroni and Cheese and… Phthalates?
Macaroni and cheese is not just a favorite childhood snack but it is also considered one of the best low-cost meals for college students and comfort foods for adults. Now, a recent test of 30 cheese products shows that mac and cheese may contain high concentrations of...
Hernia Mesh Repairs Leaving Patients in Chronic Pain
The use of mesh in hernia repairs is leaving many patients in chronic pain, according to surgeons interviewed by the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire program. Mesh implants are the recommended method for treating hernias by NHS England, which is part of the country’s...
First 2 Claim in NFL Lawsuit Settle for $9 Million
The first two claims related to the NFL’s settlement with thousands of former players over concussion risks were finally approved for a total of $9 million in benefits. According to the Associated Press, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of...
"I've worked with this law firm twice, both tragic events and could not have been more impressed or satisfied. I worked with an attorney, who was consistent, understanding and very clear about things. She stayed on top of things and made sure I was fully aware and advised!! Speedy service and no cut corners. Definitely would recommend them. I'm in Atlanta by the way and was recommended by a friend. Never had to leave my home for anything besides treatment. Thanks!!!
"My Attorney was a bulldog at getting you what you deserve and more. She did not stop until she got me the maximum amount for my case. She was very persistent and consistent throughout the duration of my case. She always kept in constant contact with me and I really appreciated that. I'm very pleased and I will always recommend people to Bad Drug Injury Claim. Thank you for everything !"
"I have not one negative thing to say about Bad Drug Injury Claim. They are thorough and actually care about your case. I had a fantastic attorney. I have never met a more genuine soul. When people have just experienced a traumatizing event they need to show them that warmth and sympathy and she was all of the above. She applies as much pressure as needed to get you everything you deserve. I will forever love and appreciate her and her integrity. I was very pleased with my settlement and I got acquainted with such a beautiful spirit."
Please be advised that certain states may consider this an attorney advertisement for legal services paid for by a non-attorney spokesperson. Bad Drug Injury Claim is an advertising group that represents lawyers jointly advertising their services. Bad Drug Injury Claim is not a law firm or lawyer referral service.
You may be entitled to compensation if you or a loved one have been injured by a dangerous drug, medical device or product. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers. Results are not guaranteed.
You should not rely upon any information herein as legal or medical advice. Any medical decision is important. Please consult your physician before altering usage of any drug.
By contacting Bad Drug Injury Claim, you agree to receive a call back by up to two different legal service providers, even if you are on the "Do Not Call" registry. If there are multiple participating legal service providers, matching of an initial inquiry to a specific legal service providers is done by an internal random process. Some cases may be transferred to other attorneys, discuss with your attorney. Bad Drug Injury Claim is not otherwise affiliated with or responsible for the representations or services provided by the legal service providers.
By visiting this site and/or replying to our TV Advertisements, you agree that Bad Drug Injury Claim is not responsible or liable for any claim, loss or damage or any kind, directly or indirectly resulting from your use of any law firm, legal advice or any information obtained from Bad Drug Injury Claim. By placing a call or entering Bad Drug Injury Claim (and the links accessible through this site) you expressly acknowledge your understanding and agreement to all of the disclaimers and agreements contained herein.
© 2017. All Rights Reserved. The Eichholz Law Firm. 50 Hurt Plaza SE, Atlanta, GA 30303